This week’s session was exhilarating. After such a long
hiatus it was a relief to get back into the studio. The set had been built and
we were free to walk through and around it. The layout is of two boxed rooms
with doors and furniture. It kind of felt like playing with a real-life doll house.
An actress joined our session to help us run through the
script we were using as source material to cover the basics of shooting a multi-camera
drama. It was a stupidly hot day so were allowed to bask in the sunshine whilst
we blocked the scene. Whilst blocking the scene, we found out that there had
originally been plans to build an amphitheatre, but someone thought that a
parking lot was more important.
We were set a reading for this session. I went to the recording
studio, recorded me reading the chapter, scanned all the pages from the chapter
and created a multimedia version of the chapter. I found it to be an engaging
way of understanding and memorizing the chapter.
In this session, I got the opportunity to operate camera
one. This was my first time in session using one of the big studio cameras. It
was a lot of fun. I was shooting a Medium/Close-up of the actress answering the
phone. In the beginning, the actress was seated on the sofa and her head was
partially visible in the bottom corner of the screen. I tried to crop her head
out but was told to leave the shot alone. It took me a moment to realise that
it didn’t matter that her head was partially in shot whilst she was in the
seated position because my camera wouldn’t go live until she was already stood
up. As such, all I had to do was maintain the shot composition and follow
direction as given.
As a group, we started to select and research the roles
which we intend to undertake during our practical examination. I was hesitant to
approach the directors chair again. But the producer from the last project I directed
said I did a good job but need to communicate with the production assistant more
effectively. With that constructive criticism in mind, I’m intent on taking the
reigns one final time. In the words of Samuel Beckett “Ever tried. Ever failed.
No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.”
My last effort as a director didn’t go as well as I’d have liked, but I
did learn a lot and intend to apply what I have learnt to this next challenge.
In researching my role as director, I came across this
great book which I highly recommend to any and all aspiring directors, 130 Lessons in Leadership from the
Director's Chair. Here is one lesson which I most certainly will bear in
mind, “You are not the parent of this child we call the play. You are present
at its birth for clinical reasons, like a doctor or a midwife. Your job most of
the time is simply to do no harm. When something does go wrong, however, your
awareness that something is awry—and your clinical intervention to correct it
—can determine whether the child will thrive or suffer, live or die”. It is a
really good read despite being a tad dated, with a reference to Bill Cosby
which sticks out like a sore thumb.
We are meant to select a second smaller role to assume during
halftime of our exam. I have opted to use the autocue again. Although I haven’t
been able to find any academic writing on the operation of the autocue itself.
I have been researching editing practise as a comparative skill to directing.
I’ve found Film and
Video Editing by Roger Crittenden, to be especially insightful. “Kevin Brownlow has
described editing as ‘directing the film for the second time’, and it is not
surprising that the cutting room is the single most frequent source of
directing talent from amongst the various
crafts.” My experience in video editing has given me insight into
directing and vice versa. I like editing because there is much less social
interaction. Editing is a long, almost private process with man, mind and
machine blending together to create cohesive moving images. Directing, by
nature needs people to be directed. You must socially navigate through everyone’s
expectations to birth a sustainable project. 13 Questions every director should
ask according to Crittenden are included in the following appendix.
749
Bibliography
Crittenden, Roger. Film and Video Editing, Taylor &
Francis Group, 1995.
Hauser, Frank, and Russell Reich. Notes on Directing : 130 Lessons in Leadership from the Director's
Chair, RCR Creative Press, 2003.
Beckett, Samuel Worstward
Ho. 1983
Appendix
“The shooting
script or, in the case of documentary, the shotlist, is meant to provide us
with a template for the film or video before it exists. However, each director
is dealing, at the moment of shooting, with the fundamental question: how do I
shoot to provide the most effective material for editing? If we understand the
dramaturgy of the script we can analyse how the details of the mise-en-scène
can be captured on the film or tape to provide the raw material that the editor
needs. So what questions should be kept in mind during the shooting? Each scene
should be examined to identify the following:
1. Where is the focus of interest?
2. When and to what does that focus shift?
3. What is
the mood and consequent pace of the scene?
4. Does that mood/pace change?
5. Are there
natural pauses which should be reflected in silence and stillness?
6.
What significant detail must be seen?
7.
Conversely, when is it important to see the whole area in which the action
takes place?
8.
When is a reaction more important than an action?
9. How should movement be encompassed?
10. Does any
off-screen or non-synchronous sound contribute to the scene?
11. How do
the beginning and end of the scene relate to those immediately before and
after?
12. Does the setting
occur more than once in the script, and therefore need to be established in a
particular way?
13. Can the
turning point of the scene be pinpointed?”
No comments:
Post a Comment